PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
67.06%
Some net income increase while BABA is negative at -26.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.49%
Some D&A expansion while BABA is negative at -49.06%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
863.64%
Deferred tax of 863.64% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
41.18%
SBC growth while BABA is negative at -20.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
175.47%
Working capital change of 175.47% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-387.38%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-107.41%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
116.93%
AP growth of 116.93% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
25.13%
Growth of 25.13% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
3.79%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BABA's 67.69%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
260.42%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BABA's 45.42%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-45.12%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
12.50%
Acquisition growth of 12.50% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-158.65%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-18.19%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-242.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while BABA is 64.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-251.95%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 64.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-21.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.