PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.43%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BABA at -17.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-13.10%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BABA at -4.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
74.05%
Deferred tax of 74.05% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-4.51%
Negative yoy SBC while BABA is 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-187.31%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
132.31%
AR growth of 132.31% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
191.82%
Inventory growth of 191.82% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-175.30%
Negative yoy AP while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-163.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
242.34%
Well above BABA's 195.60%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-84.41%
Negative yoy CFO while BABA is 86.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-27.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
88.29%
Acquisition spending well above BABA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-132.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
52.45%
Liquidation growth of 52.45% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-0.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -26.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-151.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -26.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
29.66%
Debt repayment growth of 29.66% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.