PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.82%
Net income growth under 50% of BABA's 238.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.20%
Some D&A expansion while BABA is negative at -1.96%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
44.41%
Deferred tax of 44.41% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
48.04%
SBC growth well above BABA's 14.48%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
193.27%
Working capital change of 193.27% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-326.15%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-148.28%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
207.11%
AP growth of 207.11% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
190.34%
Growth of 190.34% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-177.06%
Both negative yoy, with BABA at -379.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
572.52%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BABA's 36.73%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-9.77%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-29.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-28.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-30.00%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-38.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -1.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-100.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -1.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-50.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.