PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.07%
Some net income increase while BABA is negative at -93.83%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
16.79%
D&A growth well above BABA's 23.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-654.58%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
11.98%
Less SBC growth vs. BABA's 305.39%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
762.03%
Working capital change of 762.03% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-126.19%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
108.44%
Inventory growth of 108.44% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
262.19%
AP growth of 262.19% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
3315.52%
Growth of 3315.52% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-84.35%
Both negative yoy, with BABA at -94.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
154.35%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -97.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-34.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
78.10%
Acquisition growth of 78.10% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
32.00%
Liquidation growth of 32.00% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
29.80%
Growth well above BABA's 43.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-7.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -1.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
11.72%
Debt repayment growth of 11.72% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.