PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.06%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BABA at -39.25%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.06%
Some D&A expansion while BABA is negative at -2.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-58.84%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.72%
Less SBC growth vs. BABA's 220.08%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
56.00%
Working capital change of 56.00% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-97.87%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
31.25%
Inventory growth of 31.25% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.57%
AP growth of 100.57% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
51.61%
Growth of 51.61% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
13.04%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BABA's 5937.31%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
201.80%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BABA's 8.38%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-18.26%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
49.21%
Acquisition growth of 49.21% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-49.81%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-25.88%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
45.25%
We have some outflow growth while BABA is negative at -1.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-154.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -1.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
26.56%
Debt repayment growth of 26.56% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.