PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-126.84%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 939.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-8.41%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BABA at -10.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
44.77%
Some yoy growth while BABA is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-11.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BABA at -84.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-285.01%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BABA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
76.88%
AR growth of 76.88% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-36.50%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-217.41%
Both negative yoy AP, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-144.54%
Negative yoy usage while BABA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
175.03%
Some yoy increase while BABA is negative at -160.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-112.63%
Negative yoy CFO while BABA is 38.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.04%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BABA's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-1564.30%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
78.66%
Purchases well above BABA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
81.49%
Liquidation growth of 81.49% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-50.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -151.86%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
107.20%
We have mild expansions while BABA is negative at -72.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
52.14%
Debt repayment growth of 52.14% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.