PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-90.32%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BABA at -209.44%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
24.31%
Some D&A expansion while BABA is negative at -0.21%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-308.12%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.90%
Less SBC growth vs. BABA's 145.20%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
300.34%
Working capital change of 300.34% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-83.31%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
334.43%
Inventory growth of 334.43% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
903.59%
AP growth of 903.59% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
18376.47%
Growth of 18376.47% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
399.83%
Some yoy increase while BABA is negative at -79.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
155.81%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -108.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
6.10%
Acquisition growth of 6.10% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
2.51%
Purchases growth of 2.51% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
920.29%
Liquidation growth of 920.29% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-13.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -159.64%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
30.67%
We have mild expansions while BABA is negative at -158.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-275.25%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.