PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1041.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x BABA's 204.71%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BABA at -2.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
85.98%
Well above BABA's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-15.31%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BABA at -71.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-236.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BABA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
117.31%
AR growth of 117.31% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-88.33%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-214.33%
Both negative yoy AP, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-178.72%
Negative yoy usage while BABA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-84.50%
Both negative yoy, with BABA at -85.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-83.59%
Negative yoy CFO while BABA is 581.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
14.37%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BABA's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-322.74%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-45.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-80.38%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1.30%
We reduce yoy other investing while BABA is 68.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.07%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 68.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-20.72%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while BABA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.