PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.82%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 45.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.46%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BABA at -1.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
35.93%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BABA's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-21.49%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BABA at -121.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-173.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
82.74%
AR growth of 82.74% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-32.80%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-203.62%
Negative yoy AP while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-98.87%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BABA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
10980.53%
Well above BABA's 137.73%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-55.28%
Negative yoy CFO while BABA is 44.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-2.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 79.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-520.47%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-351.72%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-11.22%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-66.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while BABA is 123.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-41.75%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 146.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
83.04%
Debt repayment growth of 83.04% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.