PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.28%
Some net income increase while BABA is negative at -19.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.03%
Some D&A expansion while BABA is negative at -3.68%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
16.31%
Deferred tax of 16.31% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
35.50%
Less SBC growth vs. BABA's 519.28%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
38.44%
Working capital change of 38.44% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-159.96%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-273.70%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
153.23%
AP growth of 153.23% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-67.32%
Negative yoy usage while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-18.69%
Negative yoy while BABA is 70.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BABA's 8.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-18.06%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 25.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
127.75%
Acquisition growth of 127.75% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-329.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
134.55%
Liquidation growth of 134.55% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1046.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -195.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-23.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -288.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-257.48%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.