PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.67%
Some net income increase while BABA is negative at -47.91%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
11.66%
Less D&A growth vs. BABA's 141.75%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-67.77%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.66%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BABA at -8.90%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-9.70%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
68.27%
AR growth of 68.27% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
51.09%
Inventory growth of 51.09% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-107.94%
Negative yoy AP while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
41.32%
Growth of 41.32% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-100.47%
Negative yoy while BABA is 287.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.73%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BABA's 31.45%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-28.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -71.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-194.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
63.64%
Purchases growth of 63.64% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
147.14%
Liquidation growth of 147.14% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
134.00%
We have some outflow growth while BABA is negative at -18.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
23.67%
We have mild expansions while BABA is negative at -30.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
40.31%
Debt repayment growth of 40.31% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.