226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.05%
Net income growth under 50% of ETSY's 155.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.77%
Some D&A expansion while ETSY is negative at -6.93%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-97.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ETSY stands at 159.95%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
77.12%
SBC growth while ETSY is negative at -5.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
60.88%
Less working capital growth vs. ETSY's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-190.22%
AR is negative yoy while ETSY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-231.75%
Negative yoy inventory while ETSY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
178.05%
AP growth of 178.05% while ETSY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-19.41%
Negative yoy usage while ETSY is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
55.34%
Some yoy increase while ETSY is negative at -193.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
91.10%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of ETSY's 119.87%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-28.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with ETSY at -111.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-3641.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while ETSY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-33.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while ETSY stands at 31.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
47.87%
We have some liquidation growth while ETSY is negative at -32.83%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
6.68%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ETSY's 941.15%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-32.28%
We reduce yoy invests while ETSY stands at 468.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-940.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with ETSY at -1.12%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.