PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.05%
Net income growth under 50% of GLBE's 158.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-27.51%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-362.23%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
362.23%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 14.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-179.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GLBE is 133.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-111.36%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
285.56%
Inventory growth of 285.56% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-227.17%
Both negative yoy AP, with GLBE at -15.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-23.26%
Negative yoy usage while GLBE is 149.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-91.85%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 337.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-264.34%
Negative yoy CFO while GLBE is 190.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
47.93%
Some CapEx rise while GLBE is negative at -162.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
103.91%
Acquisition growth of 103.91% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
65.76%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -30.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
296.31%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
96.09%
Growth of 96.09% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
143.28%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-16.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
17.13%
We slightly raise equity while GLBE is negative at -8.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.