PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.09%
Net income growth under 50% of GLBE's 158.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-3.09%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
19.38%
Deferred tax of 19.38% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-19.38%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
142.35%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
78.34%
AR growth while GLBE is negative at -90.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
27.51%
Inventory growth of 27.51% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
99.29%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-35.81%
Negative yoy usage while GLBE is 149.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-161.26%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 337.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
100.61%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of GLBE's 190.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
46.37%
Some CapEx rise while GLBE is negative at -162.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
592.59%
Acquisition growth of 592.59% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
11.97%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -30.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-29.03%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GLBE at -34.32%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-592.59%
We reduce yoy other investing while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-33.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -242.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
10.51%
Debt repayment growth of 10.51% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
31.05%
We slightly raise equity while GLBE is negative at -8.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.