PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.90%
Negative net income growth while GLBE stands at 158.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-13.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
209.19%
Deferred tax of 209.19% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-209.19%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-99.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GLBE is 133.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-219.09%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-102.61%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1284.44%
Both negative yoy AP, with GLBE at -15.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
50.25%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GLBE's 149.24%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
352.77%
Well above GLBE's 337.13%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-2691.67%
Negative yoy CFO while GLBE is 190.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-23.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
125777.54%
Acquisition growth of 125777.54% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-736.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -30.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
111.62%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-125777.54%
We reduce yoy other investing while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-418.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -242.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.94%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
1206.00%
We slightly raise equity while GLBE is negative at -8.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.