226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
102.99%
Net income growth at 50-75% of GLBE's 158.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-4.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-175.46%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
175.46%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 14.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
61200.19%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
29.88%
AR growth while GLBE is negative at -90.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-1996.05%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1027.44%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
18.35%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GLBE's 149.24%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-200.99%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 337.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
642.09%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GLBE's 190.16%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
41.71%
Some CapEx rise while GLBE is negative at -162.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-102.63%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-27.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -30.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-52.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GLBE at -34.32%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
97.93%
Growth of 97.93% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-144.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -242.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
31.33%
Debt repayment growth of 31.33% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-197.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -8.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.