PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.50%
Net income growth under 50% of GLBE's 158.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.82%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
103.59%
Deferred tax of 103.59% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-103.59%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
536.90%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-222.72%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-246.34%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
280.20%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
210.65%
Growth well above GLBE's 149.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-138.77%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 337.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
721.82%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GLBE's 190.16%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-52.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-27170.05%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
90.60%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -30.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-76.27%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GLBE at -34.32%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
27170.05%
Growth of 27170.05% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
111.79%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-20.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-85.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -8.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.