PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-481.78%
Negative net income growth while GLBE stands at 158.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.55%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
23.42%
Deferred tax of 23.42% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-23.42%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-194.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GLBE is 133.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
104.59%
AR growth while GLBE is negative at -90.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
163.32%
Inventory growth of 163.32% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-186.21%
Both negative yoy AP, with GLBE at -15.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-117.46%
Negative yoy usage while GLBE is 149.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-44.01%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 337.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-167.58%
Negative yoy CFO while GLBE is 190.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.79%
Some CapEx rise while GLBE is negative at -162.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
97.39%
Acquisition growth of 97.39% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-34.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -30.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
36.79%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-97.39%
We reduce yoy other investing while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
15.95%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-20.46%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-41.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -8.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.