PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
370.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x GLBE's 158.75%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.70%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GLBE at -88.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
28.17%
Deferred tax of 28.17% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-28.17%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
11009.33%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-21.25%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
31.16%
Inventory growth of 31.16% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
504.25%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
418.96%
Growth well above GLBE's 149.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
366.40%
Well above GLBE's 337.13%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
1206.36%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GLBE's 190.16%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-13.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-289.24%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-68.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -30.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
955.91%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
84.12%
Growth of 84.12% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
255.78%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-5943.99%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-26.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -8.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.