PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.18%
Negative net income growth while GLBE stands at 158.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.53%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -88.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-205.22%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
205.22%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 14.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
121.67%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-131.77%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-135.81%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
108.83%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
154.43%
Growth well above GLBE's 149.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
32.20%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GLBE's 337.13%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
157.06%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of GLBE's 190.16%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-48.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.32%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -30.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-92.53%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GLBE at -34.32%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-499.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -242.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.59%
Debt repayment growth of 99.59% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
36.26%
We slightly raise equity while GLBE is negative at -8.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.