PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.20%
Negative net income growth while GLBE stands at 158.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.26%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -88.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
57.25%
Deferred tax of 57.25% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-57.25%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-32.67%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GLBE is 133.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-598.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-1376.38%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
322.47%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-21.20%
Negative yoy usage while GLBE is 149.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
74.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GLBE's 337.13%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-18.45%
Negative yoy CFO while GLBE is 190.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-103.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -30.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
828.39%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.55%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
14.73%
Debt repayment growth of 14.73% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-60.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -8.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.