PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.77%
Negative net income growth while GLBE stands at 158.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.40%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -88.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
60.00%
Deferred tax of 60.00% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
27.59%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 14.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
107.52%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-109.25%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-143.93%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
95.72%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
308.67%
Growth well above GLBE's 149.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2.39%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GLBE's 337.13%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
122.77%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of GLBE's 190.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-40.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-10.53%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -30.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
38.53%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.36%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
39.34%
Debt repayment growth of 39.34% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.