PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.68%
Negative net income growth while GLBE stands at 158.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.82%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -88.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-68.75%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-8.33%
Negative yoy SBC while GLBE is 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-164.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GLBE is 133.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
167.61%
AR growth while GLBE is negative at -90.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
149.49%
Inventory growth of 149.49% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-176.96%
Both negative yoy AP, with GLBE at -15.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-96.55%
Negative yoy usage while GLBE is 149.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
29.20%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GLBE's 337.13%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-145.57%
Negative yoy CFO while GLBE is 190.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
9.15%
Some CapEx rise while GLBE is negative at -162.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
48.71%
Acquisition growth of 48.71% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
35.65%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -30.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
74.37%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
132.10%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-11.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.