PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
261.40%
Net income growth above 1.5x GLBE's 158.75%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
5.47%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -88.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2050.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
38.33%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 14.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
153.24%
Well above GLBE's 133.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-197.51%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -90.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-103.74%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
108.78%
A yoy AP increase while GLBE is negative at -15.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
46.93%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GLBE's 149.24%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-24.21%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 337.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
233.22%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x GLBE's 190.16%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-39.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -162.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.81%
Acquisition growth of 97.81% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
36.61%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -30.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
25.33%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
74.63%
Growth of 74.63% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
25.50%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -242.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
3.15%
Debt repayment growth of 3.15% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.