PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.75%
Net income growth under 50% of GLBE's 411.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.48%
D&A growth well above GLBE's 7.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-36.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-12.03%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GLBE at -65.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-135.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GLBE at -125.95%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
29.36%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. GLBE's 60.55%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-480.21%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GLBE at -152.35%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-57.54%
Both negative yoy AP, with GLBE at -72.68%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-111.92%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GLBE at -31.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-102.05%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 188.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-41.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GLBE at -104.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-48.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -130.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1370.34%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
9.06%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -254400.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
61.40%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
48.70%
Growth of 48.70% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
10.83%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -11230.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-9.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.