226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.07%
Net income growth under 50% of GLBE's 247.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
16.79%
D&A growth well above GLBE's 6.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-654.58%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
11.98%
Less SBC growth vs. GLBE's 209.75%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
762.03%
Well above GLBE's 1248.01% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-126.19%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -425.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
108.44%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GLBE's 742.73%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
262.19%
Lower AP growth vs. GLBE's 706.85%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
3315.52%
Growth well above GLBE's 60.99%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-84.35%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 1229.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
154.35%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GLBE's 7001.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-34.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -2.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
78.10%
Acquisition growth of 78.10% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -258.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
32.00%
Liquidation growth of 32.00% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
29.80%
We have some outflow growth while GLBE is negative at -258.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-7.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -252.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
11.72%
Debt repayment growth of 11.72% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.