PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x GLBE's 8.94%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.86%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -7.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
2.30%
Deferred tax of 2.30% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
60.28%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 61.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
55.30%
Well above GLBE's 93.31% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-348.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -81.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-48.81%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
139.43%
Lower AP growth vs. GLBE's 719.04%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
76.11%
Growth well above GLBE's 105.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-30.08%
Both negative yoy, with GLBE at -82.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
421.33%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of GLBE's 560.59%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-5.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while GLBE is 59.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
95.92%
Acquisition spending well above GLBE's 99.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
81.35%
Purchases well above GLBE's 98.56%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-88.54%
We reduce yoy sales while GLBE is 238.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
34.49%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GLBE's 225.99%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1433.11%
We reduce yoy invests while GLBE stands at 112.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-274.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -232.86%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.