PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
241.62%
Some net income increase while GLBE is negative at -32.28%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.36%
Less D&A growth vs. GLBE's 42.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
57.80%
Deferred tax of 57.80% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.66%
SBC growth while GLBE is negative at -29.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
34.98%
Slight usage while GLBE is negative at -30.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
29.49%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. GLBE's 267.03%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
118.82%
Inventory growth of 118.82% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-133.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with GLBE at -229.23%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
103.12%
Some yoy usage while GLBE is negative at -24.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-118.45%
Both negative yoy, with GLBE at -7320.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
27.21%
Some CFO growth while GLBE is negative at -113.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while GLBE is 26.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-241.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -6214.14%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
27.36%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -10949.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-78.64%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GLBE at -21.68%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-17.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -194.37%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-29.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -500.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
86.87%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of GLBE's 98.96%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.