PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.28%
Net income growth similar to GLBE's 29.98%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
3.03%
D&A growth well above GLBE's 0.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
16.31%
Deferred tax of 16.31% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
35.50%
SBC growth well above GLBE's 28.58%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
38.44%
Less working capital growth vs. GLBE's 142.45%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-159.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GLBE at -1395.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-273.70%
Negative yoy inventory while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
153.23%
AP growth well above GLBE's 113.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-67.32%
Negative yoy usage while GLBE is 166.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-18.69%
Both negative yoy, with GLBE at -50.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
33.13%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GLBE's 218.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-18.06%
Negative yoy CapEx while GLBE is 35.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
127.75%
Acquisition growth of 127.75% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-329.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while GLBE stands at 42.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
134.55%
We have some liquidation growth while GLBE is negative at -37.90%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-1046.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-23.94%
We reduce yoy invests while GLBE stands at 2654.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-257.48%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GLBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.