PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.67%
Some net income increase while GLBE is negative at -0.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
11.66%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -10.47%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-67.77%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.66%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GLBE at -13.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-9.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GLBE at -89.85%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
68.27%
AR growth while GLBE is negative at -241.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
51.09%
Inventory growth of 51.09% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-107.94%
Negative yoy AP while GLBE is 181.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
41.32%
Some yoy usage while GLBE is negative at -25.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-100.47%
Both negative yoy, with GLBE at -7.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.73%
Some CFO growth while GLBE is negative at -52.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.38%
Negative yoy CapEx while GLBE is 30.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-194.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
63.64%
Some yoy expansion while GLBE is negative at -215.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
147.14%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x GLBE's 78.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
134.00%
Growth of 134.00% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
23.67%
We have mild expansions while GLBE is negative at -1425.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
40.31%
Debt repayment growth of 40.31% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.