PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.51%
Net income growth under 50% of GLBE's 106.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
16.28%
Some D&A expansion while GLBE is negative at -0.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-22.10%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.34%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GLBE at -1.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
206.38%
Less working capital growth vs. GLBE's 2141.96%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-473.89%
AR is negative yoy while GLBE is 175.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
161.90%
Inventory growth of 161.90% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
1929.35%
AP growth well above GLBE's 484.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
136.69%
Some yoy usage while GLBE is negative at -60.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-244.68%
Negative yoy while GLBE is 42.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
75.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GLBE's 327.32%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -21.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-307.56%
Negative yoy acquisition while GLBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-308.51%
Negative yoy purchasing while GLBE stands at 11.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-54.43%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GLBE at -61.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
32.79%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GLBE's 304100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-121.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with GLBE at -74.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
71.83%
Debt repayment growth of 71.83% while GLBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.