PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-123.80%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
139.21%
D&A growth of 139.21% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1173.22%
Working capital change of 1173.22% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.07%
Inventory growth of 10.07% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.49%
Growth of 138.49% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
81.32%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -301.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-72.23%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -173.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-382.82%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.39%
Purchases growth of 45.39% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
33.93%
Liquidation growth of 33.93% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.36%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JD's 230.06%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.31%
Issuance growth of 132.31% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.