PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x JD's 10.51%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-27.51%
Negative yoy D&A while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-362.23%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
362.23%
SBC growth of 362.23% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-179.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-111.36%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
285.56%
Inventory growth of 285.56% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-227.17%
Negative yoy AP while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-23.26%
Negative yoy usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-91.85%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -301.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-264.34%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -173.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
47.93%
CapEx growth of 47.93% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
103.91%
Acquisition growth of 103.91% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
65.76%
Purchases growth of 65.76% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
296.31%
Liquidation growth of 296.31% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
96.09%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. JD's 248.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
143.28%
Investing outflow well above JD's 230.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-16.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
17.13%
Issuance growth of 17.13% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.