PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-555.08%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-60.88%
Negative yoy D&A while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-464.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
464.33%
SBC growth of 464.33% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-165.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-154.90%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
133.84%
Inventory growth of 133.84% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-161.22%
Negative yoy AP while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
3.75%
Growth of 3.75% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
44.46%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -301.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-169.04%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -173.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.57%
CapEx growth of 35.57% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
93.93%
Acquisition growth of 93.93% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
53.10%
Purchases growth of 53.10% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
102.89%
Liquidation growth of 102.89% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
107.73%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. JD's 248.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
98.92%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JD's 230.06%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-2.77%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
107.58%
Issuance growth of 107.58% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.