PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-304.12%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.51%
Negative yoy D&A while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
111.76%
SBC growth of 111.76% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
105.53%
Working capital change of 105.53% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
56.47%
AR growth of 56.47% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
251.31%
Inventory growth of 251.31% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
78.63%
AP growth of 78.63% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-35.14%
Negative yoy usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
362.97%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -301.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
101.92%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -173.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-53.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
149.73%
Acquisition growth of 149.73% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-123.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
56.20%
Liquidation growth of 56.20% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-149.73%
We reduce yoy other investing while JD is 248.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3650.24%
We reduce yoy invests while JD stands at 230.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
24.79%
Debt repayment growth of 24.79% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
478.57%
Issuance growth of 478.57% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.