PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
92.96%
Net income growth above 1.5x JD's 10.51%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
16.67%
D&A growth of 16.67% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-101.30%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
11.11%
SBC growth of 11.11% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
385.99%
Working capital change of 385.99% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-228.39%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-23.19%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
218.26%
AP growth of 218.26% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
350.00%
Growth of 350.00% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-88.98%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -301.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
226.66%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -173.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-33.01%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
120.00%
Acquisition growth of 120.00% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-176.92%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
17.41%
Liquidation growth of 17.41% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
300.00%
Growth well above JD's 248.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-432.45%
We reduce yoy invests while JD stands at 230.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-540.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.