PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.77%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.40%
D&A growth of 8.40% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
60.00%
Deferred tax of 60.00% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
27.59%
SBC growth of 27.59% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
107.52%
Working capital change of 107.52% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-109.25%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-143.93%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
95.72%
AP growth of 95.72% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
308.67%
Growth of 308.67% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
2.39%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -301.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
122.77%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -173.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-40.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-10.53%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.81%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
38.53%
Liquidation growth of 38.53% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.36%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JD's 230.06%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
39.34%
Debt repayment growth of 39.34% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.