PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.68%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.82%
D&A growth of 18.82% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-68.75%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-8.33%
Negative yoy SBC while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-164.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
167.61%
AR growth of 167.61% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
149.49%
Inventory growth of 149.49% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-176.96%
Negative yoy AP while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-96.55%
Negative yoy usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
29.20%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -301.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-145.57%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -173.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
9.15%
CapEx growth of 9.15% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
48.71%
Acquisition growth of 48.71% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
35.65%
Purchases growth of 35.65% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
74.37%
Liquidation growth of 74.37% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while JD is 248.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
132.10%
Investing outflow well above JD's 230.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-11.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.