226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.46%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 104.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.74%
Some D&A expansion while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
45.95%
Some yoy growth while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.55%
Both cut yoy SBC, with JD at -38.48%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-160.23%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
171.19%
AR growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
154.93%
Inventory growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-185.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
44.46%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -961.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-146.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
66.91%
CapEx growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-194.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
49.21%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. JD's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
18.38%
We have some liquidation growth while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
83.24%
Growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
69.18%
Investing outflow well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-16.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.