PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
261.40%
Net income growth above 1.5x JD's 28.13%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
5.47%
Some D&A expansion while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2050.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
38.33%
Less SBC growth vs. JD's 78.70%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
153.24%
Working capital change of 153.24% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-197.51%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-103.74%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
108.78%
AP growth of 108.78% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
46.93%
Growth of 46.93% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-24.21%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -59.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
233.22%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -69.39%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.27%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 12.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
97.81%
Acquisition growth of 97.81% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
36.61%
Purchases growth of 36.61% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
25.33%
Liquidation growth of 25.33% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
74.63%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. JD's 227.69%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
25.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JD's 128.44%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
3.15%
Debt repayment growth of 3.15% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.