PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.13%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with JD at -3.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.32%
D&A growth of 6.32% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-46.51%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.37%
Negative yoy SBC while JD is 17.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
54.31%
Working capital change of 54.31% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-36.74%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-5592.59%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
444.24%
AP growth of 444.24% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
51.58%
Growth of 51.58% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-5.60%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -262.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.70%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -446.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
1.48%
Some CapEx rise while JD is negative at -22.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1212.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-79.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
122.34%
Liquidation growth of 122.34% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
50.32%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. JD's 187.02%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-0.07%
We reduce yoy invests while JD stands at 420.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.37%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.