PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
67.06%
Net income growth at 75-90% of JD's 86.03%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
4.49%
Some D&A expansion while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
863.64%
Deferred tax of 863.64% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
41.18%
SBC growth well above JD's 35.71%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
175.47%
Working capital change of 175.47% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-387.38%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-107.41%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
116.93%
AP growth of 116.93% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
25.13%
Growth of 25.13% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
3.79%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -28.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
260.42%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -7.22%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -6.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
12.50%
Acquisition growth of 12.50% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-158.65%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-18.19%
We reduce yoy sales while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-242.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -6041.82%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-251.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -1183.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-21.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.