PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
197.22%
Some net income increase while JD is negative at -101.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.22%
Less D&A growth vs. JD's 404.44%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-248.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.30%
SBC growth well above JD's 10.59%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
162.51%
Working capital change of 162.51% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-186.74%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4.75%
Inventory growth of 4.75% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
186.73%
AP growth of 186.73% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
92.08%
Growth of 92.08% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-38.37%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -118.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
137.43%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -145.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-8.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -53.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.43%
Acquisition growth of 96.43% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-63.73%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-13.84%
We reduce yoy sales while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-70.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while JD is 34.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-62.41%
We reduce yoy invests while JD stands at 30.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-12.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.