PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-59.42%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with JD at -451.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
11.32%
D&A growth well above JD's 6.18%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
29.67%
Deferred tax of 29.67% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-11.45%
Negative yoy SBC while JD is 12.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-50.24%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-9.59%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-3277.51%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
8053.19%
AP growth of 8053.19% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
26.29%
Growth of 26.29% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
129.35%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -38.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.49%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -49.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-10.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -162.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-104.38%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
30.72%
Purchases growth of 30.72% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
19.64%
Liquidation growth of 19.64% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-23.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -47.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
32.84%
We have mild expansions while JD is negative at -64.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-26.92%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.