PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
353.83%
Some net income increase while JD is negative at -89.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.54%
Less D&A growth vs. JD's 20.60%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-498.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
15.72%
SBC growth well above JD's 28.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
205.70%
Working capital change of 205.70% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-34.07%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
72.87%
Inventory growth of 72.87% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
108.48%
AP growth of 108.48% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1009.76%
Growth of 1009.76% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-3360.16%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -31.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
202.01%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -55.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-20.24%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 21.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
41.74%
Acquisition growth of 41.74% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
45.73%
Purchases growth of 45.73% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-20.69%
We reduce yoy sales while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
147.24%
Growth well above JD's 41.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
15.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JD's 36.87%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-16.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.