PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-126.84%
Negative net income growth while JD stands at 33.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-8.41%
Negative yoy D&A while JD is 6.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
44.77%
Deferred tax of 44.77% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-11.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with JD at -38.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-285.01%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
76.88%
AR growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-36.50%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-217.41%
Negative yoy AP while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-144.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
175.03%
Some yoy increase while JD is negative at -99.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-112.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JD at -153.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
21.04%
CapEx growth well above JD's 34.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-1564.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
78.66%
Purchases growth of 78.66% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
81.49%
Liquidation growth of 81.49% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-50.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while JD is 161.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
107.20%
Investing outflow well above JD's 124.28%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
52.14%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of JD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.