PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.24%
Net income growth under 50% of JD's 224.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.86%
D&A growth well above JD's 2.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
2.30%
Deferred tax of 2.30% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
60.28%
SBC growth while JD is negative at -14.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
55.30%
Working capital change of 55.30% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-348.48%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-48.81%
Negative yoy inventory while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
139.43%
AP growth of 139.43% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
76.11%
Growth of 76.11% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-30.08%
Negative yoy while JD is 78681.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
421.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of JD's 1066.05%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-5.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -52.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
95.92%
Acquisition growth of 95.92% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
81.35%
Purchases growth of 81.35% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-88.54%
We reduce yoy sales while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
34.49%
We have some outflow growth while JD is negative at -412.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-1433.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -777.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-274.82%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.