PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
112.80%
Net income growth above 1.5x JD's 5.11%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.19%
D&A growth well above JD's 4.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-481.36%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
50.11%
SBC growth while JD is negative at -33.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
56.05%
Slight usage while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-439.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-739.62%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
126.89%
AP growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
63.96%
Growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-91.20%
Negative yoy while JD is 217.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
244.11%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of JD's 315.26%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
19.37%
Some CapEx rise while JD is negative at -12.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
91.00%
Acquisition spending well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-46.75%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
39.10%
We have some liquidation growth while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-8.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -223.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
38.80%
We have mild expansions while JD is negative at -268.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-70.53%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.