PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
46.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x JD's 20.59%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.68%
D&A growth well above JD's 2.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
56.41%
Deferred tax of 56.41% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-18.21%
Negative yoy SBC while JD is 40.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
29.51%
Working capital change of 29.51% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-30.02%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
134.05%
Inventory growth of 134.05% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-6.90%
Negative yoy AP while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.47%
Growth of 24.47% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-2206.38%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -90.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
28.78%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -67.74%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-8.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -38.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-415.51%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.85%
Purchases growth of 55.85% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-10.19%
We reduce yoy sales while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.23%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. JD's 181.39%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-21.50%
We reduce yoy invests while JD stands at 153.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
16.21%
Debt repayment growth of 16.21% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.