PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.28%
Some net income increase while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.03%
Some D&A expansion while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
16.31%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. JD's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
35.50%
SBC growth while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
38.44%
Less working capital growth vs. JD's 100.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-159.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-273.70%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
153.23%
AP growth well above JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-67.32%
Negative yoy usage while JD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-18.69%
Negative yoy while JD is 412.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.13%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of JD's 548.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-18.06%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 111.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
127.75%
Acquisition spending well above JD's 80.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-329.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
134.55%
We have some liquidation growth while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-1046.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -224.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-23.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -235.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-257.48%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.